About your Search

20121027
20121104
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5
and giving taxpayer money to profit earring firms. it's not just rick scott's firm or the scooter store. some of these companies like the for-profit college industry which is infamous for not only screwing over students but defrauding the government. these are billions of dollars of taxpayer monies going into the pockets of private equity firms and large companies. they're very dependent on what the government does. whoever occupies the white house can open or close the spigot of taxpayer money to these companies. that's the underbelly of this election. we talk about the war on women and these issues, but by the end of the day these executive orders are really what is at stake and why many of these donors are getting involved in this election. >> cenk: i want to touch on one last article that you wrote, lee. it's not just american donors, but it's foreign donors, as well. you wrote about how saudi arabian businesses might be influencing our election. >> one big spender in the election is a trade association it's called the american petroleum institute. despite the name "american," the board m
whether he will run for governor or not in 2014 against gov. rick scott. he has lost a lot of credibility. he has not been a man of his word. he has been a huge flop lopper. evolver.s call it an evil ov host: were you watching our carriage of the debate between congressman alan west n. murphy? yes.er: alan was talking about moving america truly forward. mr. murphy was talking about negativity, as these campaigns have been doing respectively. host: he is calling us from sun city florida. up next is allen, an independent in minnesota. hello. caller: i came this year in minnesota michele bachmann is going to lose her seat. we should have a couple of democratic pickups there. i want to encourage people to really look at their party candidates in whatever say they may be in. we need to get more parties to the table rather than just democrats and republicans. host: are using much of that in minnesota? caller: in prior years more so than this year. it seems there's is the republican and democratic choice. we also have an independent streak, you can tell with a ron paul vote for president and jes
hit places like brunswick. reporting live in brown rick, frederick county, scott broom, 9news now, the first day back to class after sandy turns tragic in montgomery could be when a teenager leaves her live on the way to -- life on the way to school. >> also ahead early voters get their first chance to cast their ballots since shut down for sandy. >> now that sandy is long gone the real work begins. if you have clean-up questions about your insurance coverage we have a panel of experts ready to answer your questions, call (202)895-5560. we'll be back. >>> we survived the frightening wind and rain of hurricane sandy. just in time for halloween. but filing a claim with your homeowners' insurance company can be even more scary and sometimes a little confusing. so if you've got a question, call our insurance phone bank at (202)895-5560. we have assembled a team of experts to answer your questions including agents from joseph mccarton insurance. and i want to welcome back call for action advocate shirley rooker and shirley let's talk about some of the questions that you anticipate rece
, i must say. and i always enjoy being on a panel with scott and rick. havethink we're going to an interesting discussion. i want to take on just about everything that was said so let me get started. i have ten minutes to do this. title 1, title 1 of dodd-frank. right now, as you heard, it december ignates 36 bank holding companies as liable to create instability in the u.s. economy if they fail. in addition, it goes on to permit the financial stability oversight council to designate an unknown number of additional non-bank institutions that could create instability in the u.s. economy if they fail. now what does it mean when congress gives this authority to the f.s.o.c. or december ignates this notion in the statute? what it says is these institutions are too big to fail. so not only are we worried about the problem of too big to fail but we've made the problem worse by embedding it in the statute for these banking ins institutions and perpting them to designate certain institutions and we understand from them reading the newspapers they have four institutions in mind that a
. [applause] >> good morning. i too am here and happy to be here with scott and rick and jerry. no one else. [laughter] i too want to thank, you know, george washington law and art, others who have done this. it is a terrific program. it is good they do it every year. and i thank them for inviting me and i hope after my remarks i can get invited again. i'm in charge of better markets which is a nonprofit organization that promotes the public interest in the financial markets. you want to talk about a lonely job, join us. to insure i dei have so the compliment frequently sent my way as the manual street loves to hate, i thought i would take, make a few comments on some overarching issues often unspoken. a lot to say. not much time. i'm from boston, i talk fast. if you're thinking of sleeping at this time you want to leave now. very quickly, two quick things on what peter had to say. many my remarks will address them. to say i disagree undo the line would be an understatement. first it ignores the entire fact there was implicit guaranty prior to the crisis all the too-big-to-fail banks would
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5